Home/Blog/How one missed message cost a $16,700 client and built our task system

How one missed message cost a $16,700 client and built our task system

How one missed message cost a $16,700 client and built our task system

A costly lesson we decided to share

For a long time I debated whether to publish this story. But honesty wins: here is how we lost a client and about $16,700 because of one missed message, what we did wrong, and what system we built so it never happens again.

The ideal client and a one-year contract

The client was ideal, with ideal metrics. He came to us after watching our videos and reading our articles for several months, then asked for an expert opinion. He is an Ozon marketplace seller, and we run a dedicated channel for Ozon sellers where we share our methods and results.

He had been following us, and then said: I want to work with you, take the whole store - promotion, packaging, product cards, advertising, supply. We agreed on $2,000 per month, our standard rate for smaller stores.

We signed a one-year contract, which meant roughly $25,000 of revenue for the company. Not net, of course: after expenses, taxes and contractors (about 30%), net profitability was around 70%. I estimated we would earn about $16,700 from this project.

That number worked for me, and we started.

How our workflow is set up

To give you the full picture, here is how work is organized in our company.

We have different projects and different clients. Every client has at least two chats: one with the client and one internal team chat where we discuss tasks and strategy. Contractors and the team then bring all the work and results into the client chat.

Sometimes there are more chats - extra ones for design, for supply, for whatever reason. But at least two per project we run. Importantly, my partner and I, as the company's strategists, have access to all of these chats.

We join them to track overall dynamics but do not dive deep into operations - you would go crazy with that many projects. We act as strategists on every project: focus on big-picture goals, marketing, unit economics, pricing, scaling. We see the result we want to reach and give the team hypotheses that we believe will work and need testing.

Managers and contractors then run operations and implement the tasks we set. There is also a third party - the client. He sets tasks in the chat the same way, everything happens in messages.

The system looks a bit chaotic. Picture it: the client in the middle, a working chat, us as owners and managers, managers and operations solving things, and contractors. The client can throw in tasks, we add ours in parallel - all sides of the project sit in one chat.

The fatal mistake: a missed message

Personal responsibility for small tasks, or for failing them, dissolves to zero. We realized this when we started analyzing what happened and why. One fatal detail played its part.

It was a butterfly effect. Communication on the project continued, work continued: the store, advertising, supply - we were busy with all of it, no questions there. And then the client casually, somewhere between our discussions, wrote in the chat: guys, the dimensions for our product on Ozon seem to be wrong, let's check them.

What was happening at that moment? As managers and strategists, we were busy recalculating prices. Ozon had changed its commissions, product margins and profitability had dropped, and we were urgently recalculating everything.

The manager was simultaneously handling supply, advertising and other tasks. And here is the key point: both of us missed the task - us and the manager working on the project. The task was simply never recorded.

We were busy with our important tasks, the manager with his, which were also important and objectively affected results. But the task the client wrote about got lost. Nobody logged it.

The consequences: falling profit and a lost client

Then the systemic failure kicked in. Ozon kept treating our product as larger than it actually was. The client had written: it seems our dimensions are wrong, please double-check.

When we looked into it, it turned out that yes, Ozon had somehow started calculating our products differently. The product is objectively small, but the marketplace began treating it as several times larger. What did that lead to?

Logistics costs for the seller, for our client, skyrocketed. And two months later the financial blow landed. Store profitability before the situation was around 20%.

As a result of this mistake, over those two months, it dropped to 10%. With revenue of $33,300, he was earning $6,700 net. We have since grown revenue to more than $66,700, and profitability stayed the same.

Looks like growth, looks great, well done.

But when we ran the numbers, it turned out that with higher revenue and more units sold, the client earned roughly the same money as with half the revenue. Yes, we did great marketing, delivered growth, grew the client. But the client reasonably said: no, guys, this does not work for me, I am not ready to lose money because of such basic carelessness.

And the client left. There was a result, the store grew. But one small mistake, one small oversight cost us a contract worth about $16,700 a year.

Why it happened: analyzing the mistake

Let us be honest about why this happened. Was it incompetence, lack of experience or understanding? Objectively, no.

The team did its job well: sales and revenue grew within two months. Was it lack of time - both we and the managers were overloaded? Also no.

The problem was rather the lack of focus on micro-tasks. Small tasks appear while we solve bigger ones. When managers have dozens of chats, threads and discussions, all of it turns into a graveyard of tasks.

With that many chats you physically cannot track everything. The human brain cannot track, remember and retain it all. That is where it led.

The human factor problem in business

Where did we land? We realized this problem would keep haunting us. We keep working with clients, chats and the team, we have many processes.

The situation would repeat. As a company owner, I was absolutely not okay with losing money just because we forgot to read a small message in some chat. I understood our company needed a tool that fully removes the human factor from communication.

In general, I consider the human factor in business and client work one of the most serious problems.

At the stage of capturing tasks, work and processes, the first thing to do is eliminate the human factor. So we built a system for our company and our projects that takes on this function.

The digital secretary and how it works

The system is a digital secretary, a digital assistant and auditor for your company. It was built on our mistakes, which cost about $16,700. How does it work?

It tracks every message and every task. If something happens in a chat, it flags it: this task is not done, this agreement is not fulfilled, this needs to be done, and that was discussed but never completed. Many business owners have millions of chats.

The beauty of this tool is that no task disappears without a trace anymore. It continuously monitors 100% of your conversations in every chat where you add it.

It then records everything: recognizes, extracts and logs the tasks and important points in communication, and spots triggers. If a chat goes off track, if negativity appears, it tracks it and keeps control. If a task deadline is approaching and the task is still open, meaning not done, it instantly alerts the manager: the task is not completed, you need to step in.

How the system changed our work

Working with this tool, we first rolled it out internally and saw it has a huge number of advantages. Before, we tracked all tasks manually. As managers we skimmed tasks diagonally: quickly ran through, noted something, forgot something else.

Small tasks got lost against big ones - exactly what happened with this client. And then we learn about the screw-up and the problem not at the moment it happened, but when the client is already leaving in a rage. We find out only when the client has already blown up: either starts a scandal or simply leaves silently.

And by then there is essentially no way to persuade him or talk him into staying. Manual task control means micromanagement and endless messaging. We have a huge number of chats, and before we had to reread all of them in the evening, log every discussion, and track what was going on.

With the system connected, everything changed: it captures literally every word and every task in all our chats. And not just captures them - it delivers them as short messages we can quickly scan for information across all chats. For the system, all tasks are equally important until they are completed.

It does not distinguish between a more important and a less important task - it logs all of them, because all of them ultimately affect the result and the running of the project. That way we learn about a delay or a problem on a project before it becomes a problem. We can adjust something in the moment, sort something out - not when the client is already leaving, but when the task should have been done.

And accordingly we can manage the company strategically by exception: we get notifications that there is a problem here, and we step in for sure. We do not need to sit, reread chats, dive back in and remember what was going on.

The takeaway

We understood that without this system we would keep losing clients and money. Now we control all tasks and avoid such mistakes. I hope our experience helps you avoid the same rake.

Want this for your business?

Request a free consultation. We will tell you honestly what is worth doing and what is not.

  • Free, no obligation
  • Reply within one business day
  • Straight answer, even if the answer is "you do not need us"

Request a free consultation

Tell us about your project. We reply by e-mail within one business day.

By sending this form you agree to our privacy policy. Prefer e-mail? Write to team@adwai.digital.